Cognitive Science Application: Statement of Purpose TJ Murphy
My motivations for wanting to study cognitive science can be summarized in three points. First, I want to understand the fundamental mechanisms of cognition and creativity in humans, and how these mechanisms might be generalized to other systems. Second, I would like to work in applying the findings of the first point to technologies and theoretical tools that can help humanity cope with the growing complexity of the environment we are creating. Third, I believe that success in the second point is vital for long-term human survival and prosperity, as the potential for catastrophic disaster increases with each new and more powerful technology we create. I believe that these are surmountable challenges, and I would like to devote my life's work to helping overcome them. In this letter I will briefly discuss what I have done to prepare myself for this course of action, then relate my present vision for what form that course might take.
My formal undergraduate background is in Finance, where I studied how markets represent and process information about the environment and distribute resources efficiently (to the degree in which they do). Informally, I pursued learning in philosophy and ethics. The synthesis of these disciplines led me to develop research interests in the emergence of learning and adaptive behavior in complex agent-based systems.
After finishing my undergraduate degree, I worked for two years at Toyota's North American headquarters for engineering and administration. I developed an interest in pattern recognition and machine learning as a result of a long-term forecasting model I created, which as since then been used in strategic planing for North American logistics. During my time at Toyota I led the development of an enterprise information system, through which I gained experience in collaborating in cross-disciplinary teams, acting as a project manager, and guiding software development. After the completion of this project, Toyota provided me with the opportunity to return to full-time study. Thus, I resigned from my job and committed full-time to my Masters of Science in Quantitative Analysis (MSQA) program, which I had been pursuing part-time while I worked.
I chose the MSQA program at UC because of its emphasis on understanding and controlling dynamic systems using mathematical models and programming tools such as GAMS, MATLAB, R, Arena, and scripting languages. The program provides a solid foundation in statistical methods and analysis, regression, optimization modeling and analysis, probability, simulation, and data mining. Because my ultimate goal lies in studying cognitive science, I have been supplementing my MSQA studies with other subjects that I think will be germane to to the subject; namely neuroscience, computer science, mathematics, and cognitive science itself.
Three paradigms have influenced my thinking on cognition. They are:
The memory/prediction framework for modeling the function of biological neural networks using Bayesian networks and matrix transformations (from Paul Churchland and Jeff Hawkins),
the parallel terraced scan approach to finding solutions to abstract problems which have a high degree of ambiguity using simple agents as the mechanisms of exploration (from Douglas Hofstadter and Melanie Mitchell),
and the idea of using market mechanisms to allocate resources (such as control of sub-agents or tools to manipulate the environment) to sub-cognitive agents which compete for activation (from Eric Baum and Marvin Minsky).
I believe that these three paradigms share a common kernel. It is my hope to help unify them into a coherent theory of cognition, creativity, concept-formation, and decision making. Moreover, I hope to be able to generalize the result to be applicable to systems outside of the case of biological brains, to include both human-designed artificial intelligence and naturally occurring supra-human phenomena like institutions and markets.
My current thoughts on the subject are as follows. We can observe abstract structural similarities between biological neural networks and economic networks, and I suggest that this similarity in structure implies a similarity in function. My hypothesis is that human markets can be modeled as complex systems of interacting agents (where institutions and individuals can be considered agents), and that individual human minds can be modeled in a similar way (where sub-cognitive brain processes can be considered agents). I believe that exploring this isomorphism can be aided by using the theoretical and computational tools from financial engineering and integrating them with neuroscience. If there is indeed such a deep symmetry between minds and markets, the lessons learned from the agent-based approach to mind could be used to facilitate the operation of healthy and well-functioning markets, as well as to provide new paths of exploration into the mechanisms of analogy, creativity, and general intelligence in biological brains.
More broadly, I am interested in studying the representation of concepts in vector space. Specifically, I would like to explore how concepts are created through abstraction, how concepts map to language, and how concepts are manipulated to perform acts of creativity. I think that studying higher math will be instrumental to this pursuit, including advanced linear algebra, tensor calculus, statistical learning, belief propagation, and Bayesian inference. I would also like to develop my programming skills to a more masterful level so that I can make effective use of this knowledge.
Another field that I would like to become involved with is the study of neural plasticity and long-term-potentiation. I studied this topic with Dr. Bickle at UC, and I think that modeling these mechanisms will be very useful in creating time-continuous Bayesian-inference agents for interacting with the environment. I would welcome an opportunity to do work with neuroscientists, both in the lab and in data-interpretation and modeling.
In terms of my academic career, I am interested both in research and teaching. I take pleasure in exploring analogies between concepts, and I am driven by a sense of scientific integrity to test them for validity. I also love sharing ideas and knowledge, and I think that teaching would help me develop new ways of thinking about old ideas. Moreover, I'm eager to put myself in an environment of diverse intellectuals who can help me find flaws and uncover hidden gems in my ways of thinking.
Lastly, I will return to the topic of why I believe advancement in cognitive science is important. As humanity develops increasingly complex technologies and cultural institutions, the task of understanding them and their interactions will become correspondingly complex and further out of the reach of any given individual or organization. As complexity grows and human understanding shrinks proportionally, the risk of unforeseen catastrophe (eg: our recent financial crisis) will loom larger. If such threats are to be avoided, understanding must be built into the systems themselves. I would like to explore what this means and how it can be accomplished, both for my personal satisfaction and because I believe in its grand, over-arching importance.